Staff Reporter

The uMkhonto weSizwe Party (Mk) is set to confront President Cyril Ramaphosa in the Constitutional Court on July 28, challenging what it describes as unconstitutional actions surrounding the handling of allegations against Police Minister Senzo Mchunu and the appointment of an acting minister.

The legal battle intensifies a political storm ignited by accusations of corruption and interference within the South African Police Service (SAPS).

Mk’s contention is President Ramaphosa’s decision to place Minister Mchunu on a leave of absence rather than outright dismissal.

Hlophe, representing the MKP, has slammed this move as
irrational, tainted by bias, blatant inconsistency and other forms of favouritism, arguing that there is no constitutional provision for such an action, likening it to a suspension with pay.

Hlophe alleges that Mchunu’s placement on leave is a protective measure stemming from his close political alliance with Ramaphosa within the African National Congress (ANC).

He further claims that Mchunu was instrumental in classifying the Independent Police Investigative Directorate’s (IPID) report into the 2020 Phala Phala farm foreign currency theft as top secret, suggesting a cover-up.

“The inference is therefore irresistible that were it not for their political and factional affinities, Ramaphosa would have duly dismissed Mchunu as he is entitled and legally empowered to do…like Caesar’s wife, the political friends and allies of the president must be above suspicion.” he said.

Hlophe maintains that only the Judicial Service Commission and the Magistrates Commission are constitutionally empowered to investigate judicial conduct, arguing the commission’s establishment is a further breach of the Constitution.